Does the Supreme Court have the authority to deprive the people of the right to govern themselves? Marshaling a convincing array of historical sources, Raoul Berger demonstrates in Death Penalties... This description may be from another edition of this product.
Raoul Berger, one of the greatest constitutional scholars of all time, addresses the the Supreme Court's treatment of the death penalty. Here, he explores the history and original meaning of the Eighth Amendment's "cruel and unusual punishments" clause. What does the Constitution say about capital punishment? With history and logic on his side, Berger demonstrates that the Eighth Amendment's "cruel and unusual punishments" clause does not prohibit the death penalty; it does not even require that a punishment be proportional to the crime. Rooted in English law, the clause only referred to certain kinds of punishments. Even more significant, Berger demonstrates that the Eighth Amendment is only applicable against the federal government, not the states. In short, the Supreme Court's interference in state policies on capital punishment is totally unwarranted by the Constitution. This book is highly recommended! When the philosopher kings on the court substitute their own "evolving standards of decency" for the Constitution's original understanding, we get the arbitrary rule of judges, as Berger details in this outstanding scholarly book.
Not for the timid
Published by Thriftbooks.com User , 21 years ago
Powerful, comprehensive, unanswerable scholarship. Read this book at your own risk if you would like to believe the U.S. Supreme Court has the authority to strike down the death penalty.
ThriftBooks sells millions of used books at the lowest everyday prices. We personally assess every book's quality and offer rare, out-of-print treasures. We deliver the joy of reading in recyclable packaging with free standard shipping on US orders over $15. ThriftBooks.com. Read more. Spend less.