How To Judge a Nativity

IMHO, many of Leo's classic explanations of the planets, houses, and signs are timeless and stand up well to the research of today's writers. The only drawback is that Leo distilled his knowledge before Neptune, Uranus, Pluto and Chiron were scientifically discovered and astrologically codified. Oh well. Two out of three ain't bad, but goshhhhhhhhh...the timing of it all!!! (FUN ANECDOTE: It was rumored that Gustav Holst was reading the works of Leo when he wrote the music to THE PLANETS. Imagine if both Holst and Leo lived 30 years later to write "Pluto.")Hopefully, someone (who understands Leo's mysticism and his way with words) would update this precious collection, esp. How to Judge a Nativity. Modern updates are common these days, as was done to the classic works of Isabel Hickey, Dane Rudyhar, and Llewellen George. Perhaps the Leo collection will be also granted the same courtesy.Now thinking about it: the Progressions book (The Progressed Horoscope)could still be used today because the outer planets hardly progress through a 20th century birth chart. It's a thought. But AS IS, Alan Leo's library of astrological study would have to be supplemented by more recent tomes (i.e, Marion/Mcevers, Burk, Arroyo, Tyl, etc.).