The Origin of Financial Crises: Central Banks, Credit Bubbles, and the Efficient Market Fallacy

Perhaps I don't agree with everything the author says in the book, but it is written well, easy to understand, and offers a different perspective from what we often hear on TV or read in the newspapers. At a minimum, it makes one think about various issues that affect all of our lives, and for that I give it 5 stars.

Excellent overview of the credit cycle. Some reviewers complained about the lack of statistical rigor, but I found that to be the book's greatest strength. There are plenty of econ books that provide a plethora of equations & statistics - if that's what you're looking for, look elsewhere. Cooper sets out to provide a logical analysis of the credit boom/bust cycle that is accessible to a broad audience and succeeds exceedingly well.

The recent financial crisis has produced a rash of books that all claim to provide some insight to our current dilemma. Cooper's book The Origin of Financial Crises first appeared in April 2008 and reprinted in October as the extent of our current crisis became more apparent and more widely publicized. The book provides a brief outline of the history of money and the banking system. This introduction shows readers how the various pieces of our modern economic system came into being, and the reasons that precipitated their creation. One conclusion is that moving away from the gold standard and having a central bank are essential for our economic system to function. Next, the book simply and easily dismantles the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The arguments expose the theoretical flaws of EMH and the empirical evidence that suggests that financial markets do not behave as EMH would predict them to behave. The book introduces the theories of Keynes and Minsky as alternatives to EMH and shows how these theories better fit the empirical evidence. The authors claim that nfortunately most contemporary institutions charged with stabilizing the economy adhere to EMH. This means that they hold conflicting views, and hence advocate inconsistent economic policies. If the book's goal is to promote refined versions of Keynes' theories, then it does an excellent job. If its goal is to provide an alternative explanation to neoclassical economics, then other "heterodox" theorist need to be considered as well (such as those proposed by Mises or Hayek). To the book's credit, it does cite Ron Paul, and gives credit to Mandelbrot and Fischer. Despite these shortcomings, this book offers the most coherent and down-to-earth skewering of both academic orthodoxy and central bank policy of the books discussing the current financial crisis. The writing style is crisp, the arguments are cogent and well-reasoned, and the examples are clearly and thoughtfully presented for readers with no formal economic background. Despite my criticisms, it is superior to most books about the current financial crisis on the market today. Armchair Interviews says: Important read for people in business or who just want to better understand the economy.

I completely agree with the positive recommendations of The Economist Magazine and the reviewers. George Cooper has combined a strong technical and practical investment background to produce a modern thoughtful study of how to best manage our complex economy. However, I disagree with Brady on its readability, I feel Cooper opens this subject up to any thoughtful investor {regardless their background) by writing in down-to-earth English. He uses everyday examples, like a baker making and selling bread. His clear understanding of the material and deep sympathy for the reader motivate him to use such everyday examples to completely dispense with mathematical equations. He still maintains the needed precision. I was persuaded that economic crises are inevitable, and enjoyed his ideas on how we might deal with them. I want to encourage every investor and student who is curous about how we can improve our economy to read Cooper's clear, cogent presentation.

Superb read and we all somehow always knew that our growth models cannot work forever. Just loved it - as hard as it was not to put it away in between and run to sell some stock.